Page 3 of 8~104 min topic

Fine-tuning vs RAG

Learn the controls and knobs

Each fine-tuning vs RAG control is a hypothesis about a metric under a workload—not a synonym for quality on the legal research assistant.

~13 min this pageControls

1Learn the idea

Read

Control map

See it

Change the model vs give it notes

Fine-tune

Teach voice / format into weights

RAG

Fetch fresh docs at ask time

Fine-tune = bake in style · RAG = look things up when answering

Primary knobs for fine-tuning vs RAG: retrieval freshness SLA, tune data mix, LoRA rank, eval for style vs fact, abstain policy.

Write a sheet for the legal research assistant with columns: control, current value, predicted benefit, predicted cost, rollback trigger. Fill it using this topic’s real tension: Tuning can lock tone and is slow/expensive to refresh for facts. RAG cites sources and fails when retrieval misses. Doing both raises complexity.

Change one fine-tuning vs RAG family at a time. If you move two knobs and the legal research assistant improves, you learned a cocktail, not a cause—and you cannot roll back surgically.

Read

Product exposure

End users of the legal research assistant should see only safe dials related to fine-tuning vs RAG. Infrastructure limits, private prompts, and policy thresholds stay server-owned. A user-facing control that bypasses those limits is a vulnerability dressed as UX for fine-tuning vs RAG.

Read

Make it operational

Publish the fine-tuning vs RAG control sheet next to the legal research assistant runbook. On-call should see which knob moved in the last deploy without reading chat archaeology. Unknown fine-tuning vs RAG knobs are unowned knobs.

Also pin one numeric memory from this fine-tuning vs RAG chapter: If regulations change weekly, a 2-week fine-tune cadence cannot beat an index refreshed hourly on citation freshness. That number is not decoration; it is a template for how claims about fine-tuning vs RAG on the legal research assistant should look in design docs. Scoped specifically to fine-tuning vs RAG / legal research assistant / controls-and-knobs.

Read

Common mix-ups

People confuse fine-tuning vs RAG with neighboring buzzwords when debugging the legal research assistant. Before changing prompts, ask whether the broken stage was evidence gathering, the fine-tuning vs RAG judgment itself, validation, or the product action. Fixing the wrong stage creates folklore (“we tried fine-tuning vs RAG and it failed”) that blocks the next team on the legal research assistant. Scoped specifically to fine-tuning vs RAG / legal research assistant / controls-and-knobs.

Read

Rehearsal (fine-tuning-vs-rag/controls-and-knobs)

Write a five-line artifact for this page: goal, inputs, check, owner, stop rule. Invent one fluent failure that the check would catch. Keep details specific to fine tuning vs rag rather than generic AI advice.

Read

Rehearsal (fine-tuning-vs-rag/controls-and-knobs)

Write a five-line artifact for this page: goal, inputs, check, owner, stop rule. Invent one fluent failure that the check would catch. Keep details specific to fine tuning vs rag rather than generic AI advice.

Go deeper

Before you start

Why this matters

From [retrieval freshness SLA, tune data mix, LoRA rank, eval for style vs fact, abstain policy], pick one control for fine-tuning vs RAG on the legal research assistant. Predict which metric rises and which cost rises if you increase it.

In the wild

See how this idea shows up as a product and a company — then come back to the lesson. Skills transfer across vendors.

Check your understanding

Page assessment

Answer from memory. Completion is saved from this evidence, not from opening the next page.

1. What is one idea from this page you would apply, and what evidence would you check?

All responses are required.