Page 8 of 8~136 min topic

Capstone: research bot with citations

Ship and explain the research bot capstone

A second person can reproduce brief on fixture corpus: ≥ 0.95 claims cited; fabricated ID rate 0 from a clean checkout and name the owner for CAP-RESEARCH-FAKE-ID-3.

~17 min this pageMastery and shipping

1Learn the idea

Read

Clean-room demo

From a fresh clone/directory, run the commands that prove brief on fixture corpus: ≥ 0.95 claims cited; fabricated ID rate 0. A second person plays analyst compiling a brief on bike-share policy from a fixed corpus and follows your script without coaching. The demo includes limitations: what citation-first research assistant that maps every claim to evidence IDs still will not do.

Read

Evidence pack

Bundle: contract snippet, passing tests, metric snapshot for claim_citation_coverage and fabricated_id_rate, security negative probe, rollback note, owner name. Reference CAP-RESEARCH-FAKE-ID-3 as the drill you rehearsed. If any item is missing, the ship gate fails even if the happy path dazzles.

Read

Implementation artifact

python -m research.eval --corpus fixtures/bike --min-coverage 0.95

Read

Ownership and next review

For Capstone: research bot with citations, name the human who gets paged, the review date for thresholds, and the condition that triggers reevaluation. Endpoint POST /v1/research/brief remains the production surface you operate for citation-first research assistant that maps every claim to evidence IDs — not a slide. Keep CAP-RESEARCH-FAKE-ID-3 in the handoff template so the next owner inherits the drill.

Read

Stage depth

After the peer demo, schedule the next threshold review date. File a short changelog that mentions CAP-RESEARCH-FAKE-ID-3 and the control that addresses it. Archive the evidence pack where your team already stores launch records. Resist rewriting everything “for real production” in one weekend — operate this slice until the metrics bore you, then widen. Final self-check: if telemetry vanished, would you still know to hold? If yes, you learned the operating posture this lane teaches.

Read

Field notes for `capstone-research-bot` / `mastery-ship`

Trim the demo script until every command is necessary. Record a peer signature line: name, date UTC, pass/fail. File known limitations as bullets, not apologies. Link the evidence pack from the README. Schedule the next game day on a calendar, even if it is solo. Archive the branch tag or release digest you actually shipped. In this chapter the product is citation-first research assistant that maps every claim to evidence IDs, the human stakeholder is analyst compiling a brief on bike-share policy from a fixed corpus, and the incident id you design against is CAP-RESEARCH-FAKE-ID-3. Re-state the oracle in your notes — brief on fixture corpus: ≥ 0.95 claims cited; fabricated ID rate 0 — and keep the invariant visible: claim without evidence → abstain or drop claim; no orphan sentences. Track claim_citation_coverage and fabricated_id_rate as the scoreboard. Surface under change control: POST /v1/research/brief. If you only have forty minutes, finish the fixture for model invents kb://minutes-2099 citation before polishing UI. Promotion language stays ternary: promote, hold, or roll back based on evidence, not hope.

Go deeper

Before you start

Why this matters

Draft a two-minute demo script that proves brief on fixture corpus: ≥ 0.95 claims cited; fabricated ID rate 0 from a clean directory. Include the failure rehearsal for model invents kb://minutes-2099 citation and the rollback/owner line. If the script needs tribal knowledge, the lab is not shipped.

The capstone ends when a peer runs citation-first research assistant that maps every claim to evidence IDs clean and signs the evidence pack.

In the wild

See how this idea shows up as a product and a company — then come back to the lesson. Skills transfer across vendors.

Check your understanding

Page assessment

Answer from memory. Completion is saved from this evidence, not from opening the next page.

1. Can a peer reproduce without coaching?
2. Does the pack include claim_citation_coverage and fabricated_id_rate and rollback?
3. Is ownership for CAP-RESEARCH-FAKE-ID-3-class events explicit?

All responses are required.