Page 1 of 8~104 min topic

API errors & retries

Define the lab goal and success criteria

Ship a falsifiable slice of **resilient TypeScript fetch wrapper around POST /v1/chat** — success is 429 + Retry-After:2 → sleep once → 200 with attempts=2, not a polished screenshot.

~13 min this pageLab goal

1Try it yourself

Decision drill

API errors & retries

429 rate limits are normal — back off, retry, and cap attempts in production.

Client resilience55%

1/3API returns 429 Rate limit — retry after 2s.

2Learn the idea

Read

Name the operable slice

This lab builds resilient TypeScript fetch wrapper around POST /v1/chat. The human in the loop is mobile client waiting on a grounded answer. Scope is intentionally narrower than “make AI reliable”: you will prove one oracle — 429 + Retry-After:2 → sleep once → 200 with attempts=2 — and one invariant — attempts ≤ 3, wall budget ≤ 8s, non-idempotent POSTs never replay without Idempotency-Key. Record non-goals in your notes so a later change cannot silently expand authority. The incident mnemonic for the chapter is INC-429-2026-07-11; design as if that ticket is already written and you are filling evidence.

Read

Write the acceptance contract

Turn the oracle into a table: input fixture, expected observable, prohibited side effect, owner, latency/cost ceiling. Separate model taste from software correctness — transport, auth, parsing, and termination must be deterministic even when generated text varies. Primary metric family: retry_attempts_total{outcome} and p95 wall_ms ≤ 8000. Averages without a denominator or revision label do not gate release. Fake external dependencies in unit tests; live calls wait until fakes pass.

Read

Implementation artifact

export const gate = {
  maxAttempts: 3,
  wallMs: 8_000,
  retryable: new Set([429, 502, 503, 504]),
  oracle: "429+Retry-After → one delay → success attempts=2",
} as const;

Read

Freeze the first red test

Before implementation, encode a failing check that would have caught 429 storm with missing Retry-After that would amplify to 40 calls. That failure is the pedagogical north star for later pages: contracts reject it, happy path never performs it, validation asserts it, failure-handling contains it, observability detects it, security-ops prevents privilege tricks around it, and mastery replays it in a drill. Endpoint under study: POST /v1/chat.

Read

Stage depth

Capacity note for planners: estimate peak demand on POST /v1/chat and the cost ceiling for a failed retry storm. Write the abort conditions — unbounded spend, cross-tenant leakage, or inability to roll back — before you enjoy the first green test. Prefer synthetic fixtures shaped like production over anonymized production dumps you cannot share in class. When you are tempted to widen scope, re-read the oracle (429 + Retry-After:2 → sleep once → 200 with attempts=2) and cut features that do not serve it. The teaching outcome is judgment under constraints: mobile client waiting on a grounded answer gets a trustworthy control, not a kitchen-sink framework. Keep the language of release decisions: promote, hold, or roll back — never “see if it gets better.”

Read

Field notes for `api-error-handling` / `lab-goal`

Decide what will live in version control on day one: fixtures, contract markdown, and a failing test name. Write the cost ceiling as a hard number with currency and period. If the lab involves clusters, name the non-prod context you will use and forbid prod kubecontexts in scripts. Capture the baseline metric once before changing code so later gains are comparative. Refuse tools that hide the request path behind magic macros until the oracle is green on fakes. Your README section for this page should be five lines or fewer and still falsifiable. In this chapter the product is resilient TypeScript fetch wrapper around POST /v1/chat, the human stakeholder is mobile client waiting on a grounded answer, and the incident id you design against is INC-429-2026-07-11. Re-state the oracle in your notes — 429 + Retry-After:2 → sleep once → 200 with attempts=2 — and keep the invariant visible: attempts ≤ 3, wall budget ≤ 8s, non-idempotent POSTs never replay without Idempotency-Key. Track retry_attempts_total{outcome} and p95 wall_ms ≤ 8000 as the scoreboard. Surface under change control: POST /v1/chat.

Go deeper

Before you start

Why this matters

Write the single done-definition a reviewer would accept for API errors & retries (INC-429-2026-07-11). Include the numeric gate hidden in this oracle: 429 + Retry-After:2 → sleep once → 200 with attempts=2. Then name the fake success you refuse: a demo that ignores 429 storm with missing Retry-After that would amplify to 40 calls. Keep the sentence beside your editor; every later page should make this sentence easier to prove.

In the wild

See how this idea shows up as a product and a company — then come back to the lesson. Skills transfer across vendors.

Check your understanding

Page assessment

Answer from memory. Completion is saved from this evidence, not from opening the next page.

1. Is the oracle (429 + Retry-After:2 → sleep once → 200 with attempts=2) falsifiable from a fixture?
2. Is the invariant (attempts ≤ 3, wall budget ≤ 8s, non-idempotent POSTs never replay without Idempotency-Key) stated without hand-waving?
3. Does the contract name INC-429-2026-07-11 as a risk you design against?

All responses are required.