Pick the right AI tool
Worked example: choose a tool stack
A tool stack should assign each step to the simplest capable instrument and expose handoffs for review.
1Learn the idea
Read
The working principle
A tool stack should assign each step to the simplest capable instrument and expose handoffs for review. This principle matters because an AI system produces likely output from the context and instructions it receives; it does not automatically know the organization’s current facts, private policy, unstated intent, or acceptable risk.
Use the following sequence for this page: map collection, verification, analysis, drafting, and approval; assign search and retrieval to their proper evidence sources; use deterministic formatting or templates where possible; test the complete handoff with a realistic case. The sequence is a guide, not a ritual. Skip a step only when its question truly has no effect on the outcome, and strengthen it when mistakes would be costly.
Read
A practical method
Read
1. Map collection, verification, analysis, drafting, and approval
Read
2. Assign search and retrieval to their proper evidence sources
Read
3. Use deterministic formatting or templates where possible
Read
4. Test the complete handoff with a realistic case
Read
Work through the scenario
Return to the opening case: A manager needs a weekly competitor brief using current public announcements, internal sales notes, and a consistent one-page format. Begin by rewriting the request as a small contract. Name the intended reader or user, the authoritative material, the operation to perform, the required output, and the review owner. If current information is required, identify where it will come from. If exact calculation or action is required, assign that step to a deterministic tool or an approved system rather than relying on prose generation.
A useful instruction could follow this shape:
Goal: help [reader] accomplish [outcome]. Use only [named sources or supplied material] for factual claims. Perform [specific operation] and return [format]. Mark missing information as TBD or ask a focused question; do not guess. Before the result is used, [named person or role] will check [criteria].
Read
Failure modes to catch
- Letting one chat session silently perform every stage. This hides an important assumption or removes a review point. Replace it with an explicit rule, a source check, or a human decision.
- Mixing confidential notes with unnecessary web services. This hides an important assumption or removes a review point. Replace it with an explicit rule, a source check, or a human decision.
- Publishing without opening the cited announcements. This hides an important assumption or removes a review point. Replace it with an explicit rule, a source check, or a human decision.
Read
Make it reusable
Turn Worked example: choose a tool stack into a template you can reuse this week: job statement, required evidence, failure mode to catch, and reviewer. Store it next to your other pick the right ai tool notes. When the job changes, rewrite only the job statement and re-run the same failure-mode list — do not invent a new workflow from scratch. Role of this page: Worked example.
Go deeper
Before you start
Why this matters
A manager needs a weekly competitor brief using current public announcements, internal sales notes, and a consistent one-page format. The temptation is to begin by typing a broad request and judging whatever appears. That approach makes a good result hard to repeat and a bad result hard to diagnose.
Related lessons
Check your understanding
Page assessment
Answer from memory. Completion is saved from this evidence, not from opening the next page.
All responses are required.