Page 5 of 8~112 min topic

Production monitoring lab

Handle failures and retries

When dashboard averages hide tenant Acme 40% error rate, the system must degrade on purpose without widening blast radius.

~14 min this pageFailure handling

1Learn the idea

Read

Classify and bound retries

Map failure classes for GET /metrics: retryable vs fatal vs needs-human. Retries need budgets, jitter, and idempotency rules aligned to alerts require multi-window evidence; missing scrape ≠ healthy silence. The chapter’s signature failure — dashboard averages hide tenant Acme 40% error rate — must take a deliberate branch, not a generic catch-all.

Read

Containment path

Implement the degrade/rollback/refuse behavior SRE watching error budget during a model bump needs when MON-TENANT-BLIND-9 repeats. Prefer scoped controls (one flag, one weight, one tenant, one secret version) over fleet-wide restarts. Preserve evidence; do not delete logs to “clean the demo.”

Read

Implementation artifact

- alert: ScrapeMissing
  expr: up{job="answer-api"} == 0
  for: 5m

Read

Verify harm reduction

After containment, check alert_precision on game-day ≥ 0.9 and scrape_up == 1 moves in the safe direction and watch for retry amplification. Write the stop condition that ends the incident response for this lab.

Read

Stage depth

Chaos note: inject only one fault class at a time and restore fixtures after. Watch for dual failures — dependency down and retry amplifier — which is how dashboard averages hide tenant Acme 40% error rate becomes an outage. Customer communication templates (even if only for the drill) beat silence. If you queue deferred work, define poison-message handling. Budget documents should state the maximum extra spend allowed during retries. Close the loop by linking the containment action to a dashboard panel for alert_precision on game-day ≥ 0.9 and scrape_up == 1.

Read

Field notes for `production-monitoring-lab` / `failure-handling`

Draw a state diagram for degrade modes and put it in the repo as ASCII if needed. Cap concurrent retries across the process, not only per request. Ensure cancellation propagates to downstream HTTP clients. When failing closed, choose a user-visible message that does not leak internals. Practice the single command that flips the kill switch or weight to zero. After recovery, drain or inspect deferred work before declaring green. In this chapter the product is Prometheus+Grafana board for AI answer API golden signals, the human stakeholder is SRE watching error budget during a model bump, and the incident id you design against is MON-TENANT-BLIND-9. Re-state the oracle in your notes — inject 5% 500s for 10m → Alert AnswerErrorBurn fires; recovery clears within 15m — and keep the invariant visible: alerts require multi-window evidence; missing scrape ≠ healthy silence. Track alert_precision on game-day ≥ 0.9 and scrape_up == 1 as the scoreboard. Surface under change control: GET /metrics. If you only have forty minutes, finish the fixture for dashboard averages hide tenant Acme 40% error rate before polishing UI. Promotion language stays ternary: promote, hold, or roll back based on evidence, not hope.

Go deeper

Before you start

Why this matters

Assume dashboard averages hide tenant Acme 40% error rate is happening right now. Write the first safe action, the signal that confirms containment, and the action you will not take (infinite retry, broad restart, deleting evidence). Tie the plan to invariant: alerts require multi-window evidence; missing scrape ≠ healthy silence.

In the wild

See how this idea shows up as a product and a company — then come back to the lesson. Skills transfer across vendors.

Check your understanding

Page assessment

Answer from memory. Completion is saved from this evidence, not from opening the next page.

1. Are retry budgets explicit?
2. Is containment scoped?
3. Do you preserve evidence for MON-TENANT-BLIND-9?

All responses are required.