Page 3 of 8~112 min topic

LLM tracing lab

Implement the happy path

One clean transaction through **POST /v1/support/answer** must match the oracle: fixture question produces 3 child spans; total latency attributes sum within 5% of root.

~14 min this pageHappy path

1Learn the idea

Read

Order the successful transaction

Code the narrow path that serves on-call engineer debugging a slow groundedness miss: accept → authorize/normalize → call dependency → validate → record. Keep stages named so a trace can show which boundary passed. Success must emit evidence useful to trace_completeness ≥ 0.99 and p95_end_to_end_ms ≤ 2500, not only a 200 with prose. Predict the observable for POST /v1/support/answer before running: fixture question produces 3 child spans; total latency attributes sum within 5% of root.

Read

Run with fakes first

Drive the path with recording fakes or local stubs. Assert call order and arguments. Idempotency keys or stable ids should keep retries from duplicating costly work where the product requires it. Product under test remains OpenTelemetry traces across retrieve → rerank → generate for support answers — resist adding unrelated features mid-path.

Read

Implementation artifact

with tracer.start_as_current_span("retrieval"):
    docs = retrieve(q)
with tracer.start_as_current_span("generate"):
    ans = generate(q, docs)

Read

Compare prediction to result

For LLM tracing lab, paste the CLI/HTTP transcript beside your prediction for POST /v1/support/answer. If the oracle is unmet (fixture question produces 3 child spans; total latency attributes sum within 5% of root), stop and debug this page; do not compensate with prompt folktales. Re-run once after a clean process start to catch hidden global state that would invalidate TRACE-ORPHAN-441.

Read

Stage depth

Performance sketch: measure local p95 for the fake-backed path so later regressions are obvious. Keep concurrency modest until failure-handling proves limits. Log a single structured event per success with request id, revision, and the evidence field behind trace_completeness ≥ 0.99 and p95_end_to_end_ms ≤ 2500. Avoid hidden global caches in the happy path unless the lab is about caching — and even then key by tenant. If the path calls a model, pin model id in config and echo it in the response for auditability. Remember on-call engineer debugging a slow groundedness miss experiences wall-clock time, not your debugger’s single-step comfort.

Read

Field notes for `llm-tracing-lab` / `happy-path`

Prefer explicit function names over a single god-object handleRequest. Thread a correlation id from ingress to the last log line. When streaming, define what partial failure means before coding. Snapshot one successful response body in fixtures after redaction. If the path writes to a queue, assert message attributes in the fake. Stop adding retries on this page; that is the next concern. In this chapter the product is OpenTelemetry traces across retrieve → rerank → generate for support answers, the human stakeholder is on-call engineer debugging a slow groundedness miss, and the incident id you design against is TRACE-ORPHAN-441. Re-state the oracle in your notes — fixture question produces 3 child spans; total latency attributes sum within 5% of root — and keep the invariant visible: every span carries trace_id + redacted attrs; prompts sampled ≤ 1%. Track trace_completeness ≥ 0.99 and p95_end_to_end_ms ≤ 2500 as the scoreboard. Surface under change control: POST /v1/support/answer. If you only have forty minutes, finish the fixture for missing parent context → orphan spans, cannot join retrieve to answer before polishing UI. Promotion language stays ternary: promote, hold, or roll back based on evidence, not hope.

Go deeper

Before you start

Why this matters

Without calling production, order the steps a single success takes for on-call engineer debugging a slow groundedness miss. Circle the first irreversible side effect. Your prediction should mention POST /v1/support/answer and the evidence field that proves fixture question produces 3 child spans; total latency attributes sum within 5% of root.

In the wild

See how this idea shows up as a product and a company — then come back to the lesson. Skills transfer across vendors.

Check your understanding

Page assessment

Answer from memory. Completion is saved from this evidence, not from opening the next page.

1. Is call order asserted, not assumed?
2. Does success evidence support trace_completeness ≥ 0.99 and p95_end_to_end_ms ≤ 2500?
3. Did you compare prediction vs transcript?

All responses are required.