Mastery: build your writing prompt pack

Help me create a writing brief. Do not outline or draft yet.

Document type:
Purpose: after reading, the audience should...
Primary audience and context:
What the audience already knows:
Core message:
Approved evidence and sources:
Scope and exclusions:
Format and constraints:
Success criteria:
Permissions, integrity, or sensitivity rules:

Identify missing information, contradictions, unsupported ambitions, and
audience misunderstandings. Ask up to seven questions. Preserve unknowns
as [NEEDS INPUT] rather than guessing.

Using the approved brief, propose three genuinely different outlines.
For each, provide:
- organizing logic and reader journey;
- section titles and section promises;
- reader question answered by each section;
- required evidence;
- transition to the next section;
- approximate word budget;
- strengths, risks, and omissions.

Do not draft prose, invent facts, or add sources. Flag any section whose
promise cannot be supported by the approved evidence.

Draft only the named section.

Section promise:
Reader context:
Approved evidence:
Required terms and qualifications:
Continuity notes:
Word budget:

Use only supplied evidence. Do not invent quotations, examples, statistics,
sources, causes, consensus, or outcomes. Mark missing support [SOURCE NEEDED].
Return two meaningfully different versions and then list every factual claim,
certainty phrase, and assumption in each.

First diagnose without rewriting:
- section and paragraph jobs;
- repeated ideas;
- missing reasoning;
- buried points;
- unclear actors, references, terms, or transitions.

Then propose edits that preserve facts, logic, uncertainty, conditions,
numbers, names, quotations, terminology, attribution, and requested action.
Do not add evidence, strengthen certainty, infer motives, or change authority.
Return a change log and flag every meaning-sensitive edit.

Apply the approved voice card to this clear draft.

Stable voice rules:
Context-specific tone:
Preferred terminology:
Anti-patterns:

Preserve all verified meaning, qualifications, citations, quotations,
technical terms, and authority boundaries. Do not add anecdotes, emotion,
praise, urgency, or opinion. List the style choices applied and flag places
where style conflicts with precision.

Do not rewrite and do not claim to verify.
Extract every factual claim, name, number, date, quotation, attribution,
comparison, causal statement, externally testable recommendation, and link.

Return:
- exact claim and location;
- claim type;
- source needed;
- scope, time, denominator, and certainty to inspect;
- whether the wording appears stronger than the supplied source notes.

Mark source status UNKNOWN until a human opens an authoritative source.

Against the approved brief, outline, voice card, and completed claim ledger,
identify the five highest-impact revision needs. Prioritize purpose, logic,
support, reader action, and harmful ambiguity over cosmetic preferences.

For each, show a short excerpt, explain the problem, propose a bounded change,
and list checks that must be repeated. Do not silently edit or approve.

End with an OPEN ITEMS checklist covering placeholders, unsupported claims,
permissions, links, accessibility, required disclosure, qualified review,
and accountable final approval.