Page 1 of 8~112 min topic

Local model lab

Frame the local Ollama router experiment

Ship a falsifiable slice of **Ollama-backed local router with policy-controlled cloud fallback** — success is local llama3.2:3b answers fixture brief at ≥ 25 tok/s; fallback path logs reason=local_timeout, not a polished screenshot.

~14 min this pageExperiment brief

1Try it yourself

Playground

Local model lab

Local/open weights for privacy and offline — cloud for capability and scale.

HR docs — cannot leave VPC

2Learn the idea

Read

Name the operable slice

This lab builds Ollama-backed local router with policy-controlled cloud fallback. The human in the loop is legal analyst summarizing NDAs that must not leave the laptop by default. Scope is intentionally narrower than “make AI reliable”: you will prove one oracle — local llama3.2:3b answers fixture brief at ≥ 25 tok/s; fallback path logs reason=local_timeout — and one invariant — cloud fallback requires explicit policy flag + redaction pass; local p95 ≤ 6s for 512 tokens. Record non-goals in your notes so a later change cannot silently expand authority. The incident mnemonic for the chapter is LOCAL-FALLBACK-PII-03; design as if that ticket is already written and you are filling evidence.

Read

Write the acceptance contract

Turn the oracle into a table: input fixture, expected observable, prohibited side effect, owner, latency/cost ceiling. Separate model taste from software correctness — transport, auth, parsing, and termination must be deterministic even when generated text varies. Primary metric family: local_share ≥ 0.8 and cloud_fallback_with_pii == 0. Averages without a denominator or revision label do not gate release. Fake external dependencies in unit tests; live calls wait until fakes pass.

Read

Implementation artifact

policy:
  prefer: local
  model: llama3.2:3b
  cloud_fallback: false
  max_local_ms: 6000

Read

Freeze the first red test

Before implementation, encode a failing check that would have caught fallback silently ships full NDA text to cloud when Ollama is down. That failure is the pedagogical north star for later pages: contracts reject it, happy path never performs it, validation asserts it, failure-handling contains it, observability detects it, security-ops prevents privilege tricks around it, and mastery replays it in a drill. Endpoint under study: POST http://127.0.0.1:11434/api/generate.

Read

Stage depth

Capacity note for planners: estimate peak demand on POST http://127.0.0.1:11434/api/generate and the cost ceiling for a failed retry storm. Write the abort conditions — unbounded spend, cross-tenant leakage, or inability to roll back — before you enjoy the first green test. Prefer synthetic fixtures shaped like production over anonymized production dumps you cannot share in class. When you are tempted to widen scope, re-read the oracle (local llama3.2:3b answers fixture brief at ≥ 25 tok/s; fallback path logs reason=local_timeout) and cut features that do not serve it. The teaching outcome is judgment under constraints: legal analyst summarizing NDAs that must not leave the laptop by default gets a trustworthy control, not a kitchen-sink framework. Keep the language of release decisions: promote, hold, or roll back — never “see if it gets better.”

Read

Field notes for `local-model-lab` / `lab-goal`

Decide what will live in version control on day one: fixtures, contract markdown, and a failing test name. Write the cost ceiling as a hard number with currency and period. If the lab involves clusters, name the non-prod context you will use and forbid prod kubecontexts in scripts. Capture the baseline metric once before changing code so later gains are comparative. Refuse tools that hide the request path behind magic macros until the oracle is green on fakes. Your README section for this page should be five lines or fewer and still falsifiable. In this chapter the product is Ollama-backed local router with policy-controlled cloud fallback, the human stakeholder is legal analyst summarizing NDAs that must not leave the laptop by default, and the incident id you design against is LOCAL-FALLBACK-PII-03. Re-state the oracle in your notes — local llama3.2:3b answers fixture brief at ≥ 25 tok/s; fallback path logs reason=local_timeout — and keep the invariant visible: cloud fallback requires explicit policy flag + redaction pass; local p95 ≤ 6s for 512 tokens. Track local_share ≥ 0.8 and cloud_fallback_with_pii == 0 as the scoreboard. Surface under change control: POST http://127.0.0.1:11434/api/generate.

Go deeper

Before you start

Why this matters

Write the single done-definition a reviewer would accept for Local model lab (LOCAL-FALLBACK-PII-03). Include the numeric gate hidden in this oracle: local llama3.2:3b answers fixture brief at ≥ 25 tok/s; fallback path logs reason=local_timeout. Then name the fake success you refuse: a demo that ignores fallback silently ships full NDA text to cloud when Ollama is down. Keep the sentence beside your editor; every later page should make this sentence easier to prove.

In the wild

See how this idea shows up as a product and a company — then come back to the lesson. Skills transfer across vendors.

Check your understanding

Page assessment

Answer from memory. Completion is saved from this evidence, not from opening the next page.

1. Is the oracle (local llama3.2:3b answers fixture brief at ≥ 25 tok/s; fallback path logs reason=local_timeout) falsifiable from a fixture?
2. Is the invariant (cloud fallback requires explicit policy flag + redaction pass; local p95 ≤ 6s for 512 tokens) stated without hand-waving?
3. Does the contract name LOCAL-FALLBACK-PII-03 as a risk you design against?

All responses are required.