Capstone: research bot with citations
Frame the citation-first research assistant experiment
Ship a falsifiable slice of **citation-first research assistant that maps every claim to evidence IDs** — success is brief on fixture corpus: ≥ 0.95 claims cited; fabricated ID rate 0, not a polished screenshot.
1Try it yourself
Playground
Research bot verify gate
Ship only grounded answers — block or rewrite when citations fail.
Answer cites paragraph 3 of retrieved doc
2Learn the idea
Read
Name the operable slice
This lab builds citation-first research assistant that maps every claim to evidence IDs. The human in the loop is analyst compiling a brief on bike-share policy from a fixed corpus. Scope is intentionally narrower than “make AI reliable”: you will prove one oracle — brief on fixture corpus: ≥ 0.95 claims cited; fabricated ID rate 0 — and one invariant — claim without evidence → abstain or drop claim; no orphan sentences. Record non-goals in your notes so a later change cannot silently expand authority. The incident mnemonic for the chapter is CAP-RESEARCH-FAKE-ID-3; design as if that ticket is already written and you are filling evidence.
Read
Write the acceptance contract
Turn the oracle into a table: input fixture, expected observable, prohibited side effect, owner, latency/cost ceiling. Separate model taste from software correctness — transport, auth, parsing, and termination must be deterministic even when generated text varies. Primary metric family: claim_citation_coverage and fabricated_id_rate. Averages without a denominator or revision label do not gate release. Fake external dependencies in unit tests; live calls wait until fakes pass.
Read
Implementation artifact
CORPUS = ["kb://policy-12", "kb://minutes-55", "kb://budget-3"]
Read
Freeze the first red test
Before implementation, encode a failing check that would have caught model invents kb://minutes-2099 citation. That failure is the pedagogical north star for later pages: contracts reject it, happy path never performs it, validation asserts it, failure-handling contains it, observability detects it, security-ops prevents privilege tricks around it, and mastery replays it in a drill. Endpoint under study: POST /v1/research/brief.
Read
Stage depth
Capacity note for planners: estimate peak demand on POST /v1/research/brief and the cost ceiling for a failed retry storm. Write the abort conditions — unbounded spend, cross-tenant leakage, or inability to roll back — before you enjoy the first green test. Prefer synthetic fixtures shaped like production over anonymized production dumps you cannot share in class. When you are tempted to widen scope, re-read the oracle (brief on fixture corpus: ≥ 0.95 claims cited; fabricated ID rate 0) and cut features that do not serve it. The teaching outcome is judgment under constraints: analyst compiling a brief on bike-share policy from a fixed corpus gets a trustworthy control, not a kitchen-sink framework. Keep the language of release decisions: promote, hold, or roll back — never “see if it gets better.”
Read
Field notes for `capstone-research-bot` / `lab-goal`
Decide what will live in version control on day one: fixtures, contract markdown, and a failing test name. Write the cost ceiling as a hard number with currency and period. If the lab involves clusters, name the non-prod context you will use and forbid prod kubecontexts in scripts. Capture the baseline metric once before changing code so later gains are comparative. Refuse tools that hide the request path behind magic macros until the oracle is green on fakes. Your README section for this page should be five lines or fewer and still falsifiable. In this chapter the product is citation-first research assistant that maps every claim to evidence IDs, the human stakeholder is analyst compiling a brief on bike-share policy from a fixed corpus, and the incident id you design against is CAP-RESEARCH-FAKE-ID-3. Re-state the oracle in your notes — brief on fixture corpus: ≥ 0.95 claims cited; fabricated ID rate 0 — and keep the invariant visible: claim without evidence → abstain or drop claim; no orphan sentences. Track claim_citation_coverage and fabricated_id_rate as the scoreboard. Surface under change control: POST /v1/research/brief.
Go deeper
Before you start
Why this matters
Write the single done-definition a reviewer would accept for Capstone: research bot with citations (CAP-RESEARCH-FAKE-ID-3). Include the numeric gate hidden in this oracle: brief on fixture corpus: ≥ 0.95 claims cited; fabricated ID rate 0. Then name the fake success you refuse: a demo that ignores model invents kb://minutes-2099 citation. Keep the sentence beside your editor; every later page should make this sentence easier to prove.
Across this capstone you will evolve one product narrative — citation-first research assistant that maps every claim to evidence IDs — rather than eight disconnected exercises.
In the wild
See how this idea shows up as a product and a company — then come back to the lesson. Skills transfer across vendors.
Related lessons
Check your understanding
Page assessment
Answer from memory. Completion is saved from this evidence, not from opening the next page.
All responses are required.